Revisiting Rationality: From Homo economicus to Homo Islamicus in the Pursuit of Sustainable Well-Being

Authors

  • Mikail Abiodun Sanusi INCEIF University Author
  • Huzhaifah Kamal INCEIF University, Malaysia Author
  • Mubashar Qureshi INCEIF University, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65820/ejems-5vol2-issue2-2026

Keywords:

Rationality, Maqasid Al-Shariah, Islamic Economics, Prescriptive Economics

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the limitations of conventional economic rationality, as represented by Homo economicus, in addressing contemporary global challenges such as rising inequality, environmental degradation, and recurring financial crises. It proposes Homo Islamicus, grounded in the maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah framework, as a prescriptive model of value-based rationality that prioritises God-consciousness (taqwa), justice (adl), and the collective good (maslahah) to achieve sustainable well-being.

Methodology: The study employs a comparative conceptual analysis and multidisciplinary literature review to examine the philosophical foundations of conventional and Islamic economic rationality. It draws on secondary qualitative data from theoretical and philosophical literature, documentary evidence, contemporary conceptual frameworks, and relevant case studies to contrast the ontological assumptions and implications of both paradigms.

Results: The findings indicate that conventional economic rationality treats sustainability as an ex post adjustment, whereas the Islamic paradigm embeds sustainability as an ex ante criterion for rational decision-making. The analysis further reveals that the transition towards a Homo Islamicus-based framework is constrained by ‘maqāṣid-washing,’ the use of ethical rhetoric without substantive implementation, and by an overemphasis on procedural Sharīʿah compliance at the expense of measurable social impact.

Novelty and Contribution: The study advances Islamic economics by framing welfare-enhancing decisions through maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah, focusing on preserving faith, life, intellect, progeny, and wealth. It links Islamic ethics with measurable socioeconomic outcomes.

Social and Practical Implications: Socially, the study promotes welfare, justice, and responsible economic decision-making. Practically, it supports policymakers and Islamic financial institutions in developing indicators and governance mechanisms to assess social impact, accountability, and sustainable development.

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishers. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty | Weatherhead Center for International Affairs

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

Ali, M. Q. (2025). Governance and accountability in Islamic financial institutions: A theocentric framework for a dual mandate. Tanazur, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5678/465t5s76

Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (2001), Riʿāyat al-Bīʾah fī Sharīʿat al-Islām, Dār al-Shurūq, Cairo.

Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions. New York, NY: HarperCollins. Judgment and Decision Making at Work - Google Books

Asutay, M. (2007). A political economy approach to Islamic economics: Systemic understanding for an alternative economic system. Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, 1(2), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.14989/70894

Asutay, M. (2012). Conceptualising and locating the social failure of Islamic finance: Aspirations of Islamic moral economy vs. realities of Islamic finance. Asian and African Area Studies, 11(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.14956/asafas.11.93

Auda, J. (2010). Maqāṣid al- Sharīʿah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). Maqasid Al-shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach - Jasser Auda - Google Books

Bank Negara Malaysia. (2017/2018). Value Based Intermediation: Strengthening the roles and impact of Islamic finance (Strategy Paper; Implementation Guide). Kuala Lumpur: BNM. Strategy Paper Value-based intermediation: Strengthening the roles & impact of Islamic Finance June 2017

Bartolini, S., & Sarracino, F. (2014). It’s not the economy, stupid! How social capital and GDP relate to happiness over time. Journal of Socio-Economics, 48, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.2138

Bentham, J. (1781). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (pp. 15–18). Batoche Books. (Originally printed 1780; first published 1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation - Jeremy Bentham - Google Books

Calder, R. (2024). The paradox of Islamic finance: How Sharīʿah scholars reconcile religion and capitalism. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691258324

Chapra, M. U. (1992). Islam and the economic challenge. The Islamic Foundation and The International Institute of Islamic Thought. Islam and the Economic Challenge - Muhammad Umer Chapra - Google Books

Chapra, M. U. (Ed.). (2000). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Chapra, M. U. (2008). The Islamic vision of development in the light of maqāṣid al-shari‘ah. Islamic Research and Training Institute. The-Islamic-Vision-of-Development-in-the-Light-of-Maqasid-Al-Shariah.pdf

Choudhury, M. A. (1998). Why cannot neoclassicism explain resource allocation and development in the Islamic political economy?. In Studies in Islamic science and polity (pp. 99–119). Palgrave Macmillan.

Çizakça, M. (1998). Awqaf in history and its implications for modern Islamic economies. Islamic Economic Studies, 6(1), 43–70. ssrn-3164811.pdf

Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64

El Gamal, M. A. (2006). Islamic finance: Law, economics, and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753756

Gates, D. K., Steane, P. (2007). Historical origins and development of economic rationalism. Journal of Management History, 13(4), 330–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511340710819589

Goodhart, C. A. E. (1975). Problems of monetary management: The UK experience. In Papers in monetary economics (Vol. 1). Sydney: Reserve Bank of Australia.

Iqbal, M. (1989). The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam. Iqbal Academy Pakistan. The Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam - Mohammad Iqbal - Google Books

Iqbal, Z., & Mirakhor, A. (2011). An introduction to Islamic finance: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118390474

Kahf, M. (2003). Islamic economics: What went wrong? Jeddah: Islamic Development Bank. ISLAMIC ECONOMICS, what is wrong

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Khan, M. A. (2013). What Is Wrong with Islamic Economics? Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782544159

Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332

Moro-Egido, A. I., Navarro, M., & Sánchez, A. (2022). Changes in subjective well-being over time: Economic and social resources do matter. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23, 2009–2038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00473-3

Naqvi, S. N. H. (1981). Ethics and economics: An Islamic synthesis. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.

Nordhaus, W. D. (2019). Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. American Economic Review, 109(6), 1991–2014. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.109.6.1991

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542

Ramli, A. M., & Jalil, A. (2014). Banking model of corporate waqf: An analysis of Wakaf Selangor Muamalat. Jurnal Pengurusan, 42, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.17576/pengurusan-2014-42-13

Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2008). This time is different: A panoramic view of eight centuries of financial crises (NBER Working Paper No. 13882). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w13882

Rodrik, D. (2017). Populism and the economics of globalization (NBER Working Paper No. 23559). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23559

Samuelson, P. A. (1950). The problem of integrability in utility theory. Economica, 17(68), 355–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549499

Securities Commission Malaysia. (2019). Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI) Sukuk Framework. Kuala Lumpur: SC Malaysia.

Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344. Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory | JSTOR

Simon, H. A. (1953). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice (RAND Report). 53e9a23fb7602d9702b47f9c_0.pdf

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations.

The Qur'an (M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, Trans.). (2008). Oxford University Press.

Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York, NY: Macmillan. 10.4324_9781315135373_previewpdf.pdf

Yayasan Hasanah. (2025). The Hasanah Report 2024: The strength of small.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

Sanusi, M. A., Kamal, H., & Qureshi, M. (2026). Revisiting Rationality: From Homo economicus to Homo Islamicus in the Pursuit of Sustainable Well-Being. Elicit Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 2(2), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.65820/ejems-5vol2-issue2-2026

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.