From Digital Literacy to Responsible AI-Driven Entrepreneurship: Institutional Readiness and Policy Implications for Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65820/ejems-6vol2-issue2-2026Keywords:
Responsible AI entrepreneurship, AI capability, Institutional readiness, Higher education transformation, Entrepreneurial ecosystemsAbstract
Purpose: This paper develops a theory-informed conceptual framework for responsible AI entrepreneurship ecosystems in higher education. It addresses the limited integration of AI capabilities, entrepreneurship, institutional readiness, and governance in existing scholarship, particularly amid increasing AI adoption by higher education institutions (HEIs).
Methodology: The study adopts a conceptual research approach grounded in institutional, human capital, and entrepreneurial ecosystem theories. Relevant literature on AI, entrepreneurship, higher education, governance, and innovation ecosystems is synthesised to construct an integrated conceptual framework.
Results: The framework conceptualises responsible AI entrepreneurship as the intersection of AI capability, entrepreneurial innovation, ethical responsibility, and institutional governance. It identifies four interrelated dimensions: AI capability, entrepreneurial innovation, ethical and governance capability, and institutional readiness, and explains how leadership, pedagogy, technological infrastructure, governance systems, and ecosystem collaboration shape universities’ capacity to foster sustainable AI-driven innovation. Particular attention is given to challenges facing developing economies.
Novelty and Contribution: The study advances higher education scholarship by integrating AI capability development, institutional readiness, entrepreneurship, and ecosystem thinking into a unified conceptual model, providing a foundation for future empirical research on responsible AI entrepreneurship ecosystems.
Practical and Social Implications: The framework offers guidance for policymakers and university leaders seeking to strengthen AI governance, institutional readiness, and ecosystem collaboration. It supports the development of ethical, inclusive, and innovation-oriented higher education systems capable of preparing graduates and entrepreneurs for AI-driven economies.
References
Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M. D., Infante-Moro, J. C., & García, G. R. (2020). Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: Global research trends. Sustainability, 12(5), 2107. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052107
Ahmad, A. Q. (2024). Navigating the Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategic Pathways. Exploring the transformative impact of AI across industries and its role in shaping global advancements, 26.
Akinwale, Y. O., & Grobbelaar, S. S. (2022). Digital innovation and inclusive development in Africa: Challenges and opportunities for higher education and entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121742
Al-Kfairy, M., Mustafa, D., Kshetri, N., Insiew, M., & Alfandi, O. (2024, August). Ethical challenges and solutions of generative AI: An interdisciplinary perspective. In Informatics (Vol. 11, No. 3, p. 58). MDPI.
Altbach, P. G., & de Wit, H. (2023). The AI revolution in higher education: International perspectives. International Higher Education, (114), 3-5.
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2021). Towards an entrepreneurial ecosystem: The role of the university. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 815-830.
Audretsch, D. B., Mason, C., Miles, M. P., & O’Connor, A. (2021). The ecosystem for aspiring entrepreneurs: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Business Research, 124, 1-3.
Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D. W., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1266
Bailetti, T. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: Overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/520
Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review. Higher Education, 86(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
Bejjani, M., Göcke, L., & Menter, M. (2023). Digital entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122372.
Benavides, L. M. C., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291
Benneworth, P., Pinheiro, R., & Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. (2018). One size does not fit all! New perspectives on the university in the social knowledge economy. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 731–735. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw018
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., & Pharicot, P. (2024). A meta-review of the state of research on generative AI in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 1-25.
Bramwell, A., Hepburn, N., & Wolfe, D. A. (2019). Growing entrepreneurial ecosystems: Public intermediaries, policy learning, and regional innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 8(2), 272-292.
Brusseau, J. (2023). AI human impact: toward a model for ethical investing in AI-intensive companies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 1030-1057.
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W.W. Norton.
Cai, Y., & Mehari, Y. (2022). The use of institutional theory in higher education research: A systematic review. Higher Education, 83(6), 1257-1277.
Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Balocco, R. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: Present debates and future directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(4), 1291–1321.
Challoumis, C. (2024). The imperative of skill development in an AI revolution. In XIX International Scientific Conference. London. Great Britain (pp. 132-168).
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 38.
Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): A high-level academic and industry note on ethical and social implications. Creative Education, 13(05), 1574.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Cukier, W. (2023). The role of universities in the AI innovation ecosystem. Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(4), 1250-1275.
Cunningham, J. A., Menter, M., & O’Kane, C. (2022). Value creation in the quadruple helix: A micro-level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators. R&D Management, 52(1), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12467
Currie, G., & Spyridonidis, D. (2019). Sharing knowledge for professional change: The role of professional norms and identities. Journal of Management Studies, 56(6), 1145-1172.
da Silva, A. R. P. (2024). Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges in the Future of Labour Market and Work. PQDT-Global.
Da Silva, E. B., & Gani, A. (2022). Ethics and Social Responsibility in Technology Innovation for Sustainability and Social Justice. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1(2), 44-49.
Dai, L., & Zhu, Z. (2025). Convergence Innovation: Empowering the New Quality Development of Higher Education with Digital and Intelligent Technologies. Frontiers of Education in China, 20(4), 490.
Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Springer Nature.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Theory. (n.d.). In Innovation and ecosystem development theory.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Oluwatosin Omosolape OMODEWU, Morufu Oladimeji Shokunbi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
