Digital Literacy, Self-Regulated Learning, and PedagogicalCompetence as Determinants of Learning Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65820/ejes-4vol2-issue1-2026Keywords:
Digital Literacy, Self-Regulated Learning, Pedagogical Competence, Learning of QualityAbstract
Purpose: This study examined the relationships between teacher digital literacy, self-regulated learning (SRL), and pedagogical competence with learning quality in public junior high schools in Jekulo District, Kudus Regency, Indonesia, where evidence from non-urban contexts remains limited.
Method: A quantitative survey was conducted with 112 teachers from three public junior high schools selected through proportional random sampling. Data were collected using validated Likert-scale questionnaires and analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (SmartPLS 4.0).
Results: The measurement model demonstrated satisfactory validity (AVE > 0.50; loadings > 0.70) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability > 0.70). The structural model showed acceptable fit (SRMR = 0.078). Digital literacy positively influenced learning quality (T = 3.468, p = 0.001, f² = 0.15), whereas SRL was not significant (T = 0.956, p = 0.339, f² = 0.012). Pedagogical competence was the strongest predictor (T = 7.785, p < 0.001, f² = 0.63). The model explained 77.6% of the variance in learning quality (R² = 0.776).
Novelty and Contributions: This study is among the first to compare the relative effects of digital literacy, SRL, and pedagogical competence on learning quality in a non-urban Indonesian context. It identifies pedagogical competence as the dominant predictor while showing that SRL alone does not significantly improve learning quality.
Social and Practical Implications: The findings support prioritising pedagogical competence alongside digital literacy in teacher professional development. Policymakers and school leaders should design integrated capacity-building programmes to strengthen classroom instruction and improve learning quality in public schools.
References
Anggraini, T., Ahmad, M., & Hanafi, I. (2024). Digital literacy and teaching experience as predictors of pedagogical competence in the digital era. Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(02), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.32678/tarbawi.v10i02.10795
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Creemers, B., & Kyriakides, L. (2007). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939185
Damanik, J., & Widodo, W. (2025). The effect of psychological capital, digital literacy, and knowledge management on teacher instructional quality through teaching creativity. TEM Journal, 14(1), 887. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem141-78
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives, 8, 1-1. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311
Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., Hein, J., Janke, S., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2021). Shifting from face-to-face to online teaching during COVID-19: The role of university faculty achievement goals for attitudes towards this sudden change, and their relevance for burnout/engagement and student evaluations of teaching quality. Computers in Human Behaviour, 118, 106677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106677
Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at the primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and learning, 3(3), 231-264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
Fauziah, N., Fitriah, F., & Hidayati, S. (2023). Analisis literasi digital guru kelas. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(2), 933-954. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v7i2.2057
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and information technologies, 21(3), 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
Karlen, Y., Hertel, S., & Hirt, C. N. (2020, September). Teachers’ professional competences in self-regulated learning: An approach to integrate teachers’ competences as self-regulated learners and as agents of self-regulated learning in a holistic manner. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 5, p. 159). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00159
Mahardini, S., Kurniawan, L., & Natalia, E. (2023). Pengaruh Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi, Motivasi, Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan. IKRAITH-EKONOMIKA, 6(3), 33-43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37817/ikraith-ekonomika.v6i3
Masruroh, B., Hanandini, D. A., & Vidia, E. A. (2023). Pandangan filsafat eksistensialisme dan pragmatisme terhadap pembelajaran peserta didik. El-Wasathiya: Jurnal Studi Agama, 11(2), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.35888/el-wasathiya.v11i2.5539
Memon, M. A., T., R., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2021). PLS-SEM STATISTICAL PROGRAMS: A REVIEW. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 5(1), i–xiv. https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.5(1)06
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
Ningrum, K., Aminah, A., & Dewi, S. L. (2024). Pengaruh Literasi Digital, Self-Regulated Learning, dan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Terhadap Mutu Pembelajaran di SMP Negeri Kecamatan Bambel. EDU SOCIETY: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN, ILMU SOSIAL DAN PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT, 4(3), 1782-1791. https://doi.org/10.56832/edu.v4i3.574
OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational psychology review, 16(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
Rachmawati, I., Trigartanti, W., Triwardhani, I. J., & Putra, R. P. (2022). The role of the teacher in improving digital literacy in elementary students. In Islam, Media and Education in the Digital Era (pp. 634-643). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003219149-93
Ramadhan, S. N. K., & Santoso, B. (2026). The Influence of Workload, Job Stress, and Work Environment on Turnover Intention of Inpatient Nurses at Wiyung Sejahtera Hospital. Management Science Research Journal, 5(1), 1-9. https://managementscienceresearchjournal.com/index.php/msr/article/view/188
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. https://doi.org/10.46403/akulturavaltashatasaegyeni.2020.74
Révai, N., & Guerriero, S. (2017). Knowledge dynamics in the teaching profession. Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession, 37-71. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-en
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15
Satiri, S., Hanafi, M. S., & Muhyidin, A. (2025). The Interplay of Pedagogical Competence, Digital Literacy, and Learning Facilities in Enhancing Learning Quality: A Correlational Study in Indonesian High Schools. PPSDP International Journal of Education, 4(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.59175/pijed.v4i2.667
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Sukardi, S., Aminah, S., & Dewi, I. O. (2023). Peran Kompetensi Guru, Literasi Digital, Dan Ketersediaan Sarana Teknologi Terhadap Peningkatan Mutu Pembelajaran (Studi Pada Guru Sekolah Dasar Se Kecamatan Kandeman, Kabupaten Batang). Serat Acitya, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.56444/sa.v12i1.552
Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational technology research and development, 65(3), 555-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
Windiana, W., Nihaya, K., & Nugraha, M. I. (2024). The Challenges and Opportunities of the Merdeka Belajar Policy in Higher Education: The Prospects for Its Implementation. Khazanah Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 139-156. https://khazanah.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/kp/article/view/38548
Yusro. (2024). Analysis of Factors Influencing the Digital Competence of Junior High School Teachers in Kudus Regency. Unpublished thesis. Kudus. Postgraduate Program, Muria Kudus University.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839010.ch1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Peni Retnowati , Gunawan Setiadi , Sri Surachmi W (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




